Lugo v. Lugo
31 P.R. 899
Opinion
District Court of Ponce.
It appearing that the transcript was filed on August 30 and the appellant was granted on' September 5 an extension of 30 days for filing his brief, which expired on October 9, when no brief or motion of extension had been filed; that on November 7, 1922, the appellee moved for the dismissal of the appeal on that ground and that the appellant filed his brief on November 20, 1922, together with a motion attempting to explain his delay in doing so, the court sustained the appellee’s motion and dismissed the appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lugo v. Lugo, 31 P.R. 899 (prsupreme 1922).
31 P.R. 899 (Lugo v. Lugo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.