Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Luftman v. Ross

Luftman v. Ross

273 A.D. 946, 78 N.Y.S.2d 568, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5414
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Luftman v. Ross. Read the opinion of the Court — 273 A.D. 888 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 6, 1948·Published

Opinion

Motion for reargument denied without prejudice to renewal if the Federal expediter changes the regulations so as to decontrol the premises in question. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. Settle order on one day’s notice. Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ. [See ante, p. 888; 274 App. Div. 763.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luftman v. Ross, 273 A.D. 946, 78 N.Y.S.2d 568, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5414 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).

273 A.D. 946 (Luftman v. Ross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.