Luftman v. Ross

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Luftman v. Ross

273 A.D. 888, 78 N.Y.S.2d 566, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5153

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 22, 1948

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 273 A.D. 888 (Luftman v. Ross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Luftman v. Ross, 273 A.D. 888, 78 N.Y.S.2d 566, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5153 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

On the record, in view of all the unusual facts and circumstances presented, and under the statutes and regulations as they now exist, the order appealed from is proper except that the injunction should be modified in one respect. There should be added to the third decretal paragraph a provision that the defendant, Bing & Bing, Inc., shall not be enjoined and restrained pendente lite from bringing, if so advised, any appropriate action or proceedings before the Federal Authorities for relief under the Federal Housing and Rent Act of 1947 (U. S. Code, tit. 50, Appendix, § 1881 et seq.) and regulations thereunder. As so modified, the order is unanimously affirmed, without costs. Settle order on one day’s notice. Present — Grlennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ. [See post, p. 946; 274 App. Div. 763.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On the record, in view of all the unusual facts and circumstances presented, and under the statutes and regulations as they now exist, the order appealed from is proper except that the injunction should be modified in one respect. There should be added to the third decretal paragraph a provision that the defendant, Bing & Bing, Inc., shall not be enjoined and restrained pendente lite from bringing, if so advised, any appropriate action or proceedings before the Federal Authorities for relief under the Federal Housing and Rent Act of 1947 (U. S. Code, tit. 50, Appendix, § 1881 et seq.) and regulations thereunder. As so modified, the order is unanimously affirmed, without costs. Settle order on one day’s notice. Present — Grlennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ. [See post, p. 946; 274 App. Div. 763.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

273 A.D. 888, 78 N.Y.S.2d 566, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luftman-v-ross-nyappdiv-1948.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack