Ludzinski v. United States

Court of Claims

Ludzinski v. United States

154 Ct. Cl. 215, 1961 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 112, 1961 WL 8734

CourtUnited States Court of Claims

DecidedJune 7, 1961

DocketNo. 205-58

StatusPublished

Cited by12 cases

This text of 154 Ct. Cl. 215 (Ludzinski v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ludzinski v. United States, 154 Ct. Cl. 215, 1961 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 112, 1961 WL 8734 (cc 1961).

Pincite

Opinions

Per Curiam :

This case was referred pursuant to Rule 45 to Saul R. Gamer, a .trial commissioner of this court with directions to make findings of fact and recommendations for conclusions of law. The commissioner has done so in a report filed October 21,1960. Briefs were filed by both parties, exceptions to the commissioner’s findings were taken by the defendant and the case was submitted to the court on oral argument by counsel. Since the court is in agreement with the findings and recommendations of the trial commissioner as hereinafter set forth, it hereby adopts the same as the basis for its judgment in this case. Plaintiff is therefore entitled to recover and judgment will be entered to that effect [218]*218with tlie amount of recovery to be determined pursuant to Rule 38(c).

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam :

This case was referred pursuant to Rule 45 to Saul R. Gamer, a .trial commissioner of this court with directions to make findings of fact and recommendations for conclusions of law. The commissioner has done so in a report filed October 21,1960. Briefs were filed by both parties, exceptions to the commissioner’s findings were taken by the defendant and the case was submitted to the court on oral argument by counsel. Since the court is in agreement with the findings and recommendations of the trial commissioner as hereinafter set forth, it hereby adopts the same as the basis for its judgment in this case. Plaintiff is therefore entitled to recover and judgment will be entered to that effect [218]*218with tlie amount of recovery to be determined pursuant to Rule 38(c).

It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

154 Ct. Cl. 215, 1961 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 112, 1961 WL 8734, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ludzinski-v-united-states-cc-1961.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack