Ludwig v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.
This text of 359 F.2d 857 (Ludwig v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
In the first appeal of these cases we held that the evidence was sufficient to require submission of the issue of negligence to the jury. We vacated the judgments and remanded for entry of judgments in accordance with the jury’s verdicts. 333 F.2d 621 (1964) cert. denied 379 U.S. 960, 85 S.Ct. 648, 13 L.Ed.2d 555.
Following the remand the District Judge entered judgments on the verdicts. Motions for a new trial were then filed and denied by District Judge Freeman in a well considered opinion. We are in full agreement with Judge Freeman’s opinion, which we think adequately and correctly disposes of all issues property raised in the present appeal.
The judgments are affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
359 F.2d 857, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ludwig-v-chesapeake-ohio-railway-co-ca6-1965.