Ludwig v. Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Co.

359 F.2d 857
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedDecember 10, 1965
Docket16762_1
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 359 F.2d 857 (Ludwig v. Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ludwig v. Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Co., 359 F.2d 857 (6th Cir. 1965).

Opinion

359 F.2d 857

Eugene LUDWIG, as Guardian of the Estate of Richard Paul Zatek, a minor, Teresa Serratoni, Administratrix of the Estate of Joan Ellen Zatek, Teresa Serratoni, Administratrix of the Estate of John Michael Zatek, Deceased, John Zatek and Wolverine Insurance Co., a Michigan corporation, as subrogee of John Zatek, Teresa Serratoni, Administratrix of the Estate of Lois Jane Zatek, Plaintiffs-Appellees
v.
The CHESAPEAKE AND OHIO RAILWAY CO., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16762.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

December 10, 1965.

Before WEICK, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and EDWARDS, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

In the first appeal of these cases we held that the evidence was sufficient to require submission of the issue of negligence to the jury. We vacated the judgments and remanded for entry of judgments in accordance with the jury's verdicts. 333 F.2d 621 (1964) cert. denied 379 U.S. 960, 85 S.Ct. 648, 13 L.Ed.2d 555.

Following the remand the District Judge entered judgments on the verdicts. Motions for a new trial were then filed and denied by District Judge Freeman in a well considered opinion. We are in full agreement with Judge Freeman's opinion, which we think adequately and correctly disposes of all issues properly raised in the present appeal.

The judgments are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
359 F.2d 857, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ludwig-v-chesapeake-and-ohio-railway-co-ca6-1965.