Lucy Pilch v. Rose Bareham

332 F. App'x 314
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedAugust 28, 2009
Docket08-2066
StatusUnpublished

This text of 332 F. App'x 314 (Lucy Pilch v. Rose Bareham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lucy Pilch v. Rose Bareham, 332 F. App'x 314 (6th Cir. 2009).

Opinions

RYAN, Circuit Judge.

Lucy Mazurek Pilch, aka Lucy M. Mazu-rek, a bankruptcy debtor and unsuccessful petitioner in a bankruptcy adversary proceeding, appealed the bankruptcy court’s decision to the district court. The district court held: 1) it is without jurisdiction to entertain Pilch’s appeal of the bankruptcy court’s order overruling her objection to a creditor’s amended proof of claim; and 2) the Trustee, Rose E. Bareham’s compensation was not calculated improperly. We find no error in the district court’s decision.

Moreover, the district court judge, Honorable Gordon J. Quist, prepared a well-reasoned opinion that thoroughly discusses and analyzes each issue presented to this court. Because we cannot improve upon the reasoning in Judge Quist’s excellent opinion, we adopt his opinion as our own.

Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
332 F. App'x 314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lucy-pilch-v-rose-bareham-ca6-2009.