Luckenbach v. Pearce

Fifth Circuit

Luckenbach v. Pearce

212 F. 392, 129 C.C.A. 68, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2090

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 17, 1914

DocketNo. 2564

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 212 F. 392 (Luckenbach v. Pearce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Luckenbach v. Pearce, 212 F. 392, 129 C.C.A. 68, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2090 (5th Cir. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

PARDEE, Circuit Judge.

We are satisfied from the evidence in this case that Pearce, the stevedore, unloaded the D. N. Luckenbach at the instance of the master on the credit of the vessel, and that for such services the owners of the D. N. Luckenbach are liable. See Dennett v. The Main, 51 Fed. 954, 2 C. C. A. 569; The Norwegian Steamship Co. v. Washington, 57 Fed. 224, 6 C. C. A. 313, and the case of Luckenbach v. Pearce (No. 2563 of the docket of this court) 212 Fed. 388, just decided.

The decree appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PARDEE, Circuit Judge.

We are satisfied from the evidence in this case that Pearce, the stevedore, unloaded the D. N. Luckenbach at the instance of the master on the credit of the vessel, and that for such services the owners of the D. N. Luckenbach are liable. See Dennett v. The Main, 51 Fed. 954, 2 C. C. A. 569; The Norwegian Steamship Co. v. Washington, 57 Fed. 224, 6 C. C. A. 313, and the case of Luckenbach v. Pearce (No. 2563 of the docket of this court) 212 Fed. 388, just decided.

The decree appealed from is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

212 F. 392, 129 C.C.A. 68, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2090, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luckenbach-v-pearce-ca5-1914.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack