Lucero v. Operation Rescue of Birmingham
This text of 41 F.3d 1493 (Lucero v. Operation Rescue of Birmingham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This court — acting through a motions panel — granted leave to hear defendant-appellant Pinto’s interlocutory appeal of the district court’s order retaining supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff Lucero’s state law claims, where Lucero had no pending federal claims. But, then the district court reinstated Lucero’s federal RICO claim. In the light of this reinstated federal claim, the interlocutory appeal has become a wasteful expenditure of appellate court resources.
VACATED and REMANDED.
District courts are invited to contact this court directly when one of their orders potentially affects the status of an interlocutory appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
41 F.3d 1493, 1995 WL 521, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lucero-v-operation-rescue-of-birmingham-ca11-1995.