Lucas v. Scheinman
This text of 83 A.D.2d 969 (Lucas v. Scheinman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Application, pursuant to CPLR article 78, for judgment in the nature of prohibition, denied, without costs, and petition dated July 16,1981 dismissed. The extraordinary remedy of [970]*970prohibition is unavailable to review, at this stage of a criminal proceeding, matters such as the alleged bias or prejudice of a Trial Judge which can be raised upon direct appeal from a judgment of conviction (see Matter of Legal Aid Soc. of Sullivan County v Scheinman, 53 NY2d 12; Matter of Fitzgerald v Wells, 9 AD2d 812, mot for rearg or lv to app den 10 AD2d 654, mot for lv to app den 7 NY2d 711, app dsmd 9 NY2d 864). Kane, J. P., Main, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
83 A.D.2d 969, 443 N.Y.S.2d 711, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lucas-v-scheinman-nyappdiv-1981.