Konigsberg v. Scheinman
87 A.D.2d 703, 448 N.Y.S.2d 605, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16041
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 12, 1982·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Motion by respondent to dismiss petition on objections in point of law granted, and petition dated January 9, 1982 dismissed. The extraordinary remedy of prohibition does not lie to review matters such as the alleged bias or prejudice of a Trial Judge where such matters can be raised on direct appeal from the judgment of conviction (Matter of Lucas v Scheinman, 83 AD2d 969). Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Yesawich, Jr., Weiss and Levine, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Konigsberg v. Scheinman, 87 A.D.2d 703, 448 N.Y.S.2d 605, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16041 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).
87 A.D.2d 703 (Konigsberg v. Scheinman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matter of Peterec-Tolino v. Schick
2025 NY Slip Op 01271 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
Corporation of Presiding Bishop of Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. Greenfield
131 A.D.2d 355 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)