Konigsberg v. Scheinman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Konigsberg v. Scheinman

87 A.D.2d 703, 448 N.Y.S.2d 605, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16041

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 12, 1982

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 87 A.D.2d 703 (Konigsberg v. Scheinman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Konigsberg v. Scheinman, 87 A.D.2d 703, 448 N.Y.S.2d 605, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16041 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by respondent to dismiss petition on objections in point of law granted, and petition dated January 9, 1982 dismissed. The extraordinary remedy of prohibition does not lie to review matters such as the alleged bias or prejudice of a Trial Judge where such matters can be raised on direct appeal from the judgment of conviction (Matter of Lucas v Scheinman, 83 AD2d 969). Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Yesawich, Jr., Weiss and Levine, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by respondent to dismiss petition on objections in point of law granted, and petition dated January 9, 1982 dismissed. The extraordinary remedy of prohibition does not lie to review matters such as the alleged bias or prejudice of a Trial Judge where such matters can be raised on direct appeal from the judgment of conviction (Matter of Lucas v Scheinman, 83 AD2d 969). Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Yesawich, Jr., Weiss and Levine, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

87 A.D.2d 703, 448 N.Y.S.2d 605, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16041, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/konigsberg-v-scheinman-nyappdiv-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack