Lucas Nelson v. Hartford Ins. Co. of Midwest

570 F. App'x 695
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 21, 2014·No. 12-36042·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

This case arises in diversity out of Montana. We review de novo the district court’s order that granted summary judgment to Appellees, and we affirm. Autotel v. Nevada Bell Tel. Co., 697 F.3d 846, 850 *696 (9th Cir.2012). We conclude that under Montana law a common law action for bad faith insurance practices that does not involve workers’ compensation does not accrue for statute of limitations purposes solely upon judgment in or settlement of an underlying claim against a defendant insurance company’s insured. Fode v. Farmers Ins. Exch., 221 Mont. 282, 719 P.2d 414, 417 (1986) (holding that a common law bad faith cause of action against an insurance company “may be filed to toll the statute of limitations” during the pen-dency of an underlying suit against tort-feasor insureds); O’Connor v. Nat’l Union Fire Ins. Co., 320 Mont. 301, 87 P.3d 454, 458 (2004) (distinguishing Fode as “not a workers’ compensation case”). Appellants’ claims against defendants accrued under Montana law more than three years before they filed this suit and are therefore time-barred. MontCode Ann. §§ 27-2-102(l)(a) & 102(2), 27-2-204(1).

AFFIRMED.

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lucas Nelson v. Hartford Ins. Co. of Midwest, 570 F. App'x 695 (9th Cir. 2014).

570 F. App'x 695 (Lucas Nelson v. Hartford Ins. Co. of Midwest) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related