Loyd v. State

103 S.E. 496, 25 Ga. App. 393, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 828
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Loyd v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 26 Ga. App. 259
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 15, 1920·No. 11434·Published

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

Defendant was indicted and tried for rape. The jury found him guilty and recommended him to mercy. Pending a motion for a new trial he made application for bail, and, in his brief, he insists that “ the Georgia legislature has made it mandatory upon the trial judges to grant bail after a motion for new trial has been filed;” relying on the act of 1916 (Ga. L. 1916, p. 157). In Crumley v. Gibbs, 149 Ga. 119 (99 S. E. 297), the Supreme Court construed this act, and said: “It was not intended to take away the discretion of the trial judge in the matter of granting bail.” Hnder this ruling it was within the sound discretion of the trial judge to refuse bail in this case, and this court cannot say as a matter of law that he abused his discretion. See also Barnes v. State, 24 Ga. App. 373 (2).

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C, J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Loyd v. State, 103 S.E. 496, 25 Ga. App. 393, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 828 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

103 S.E. 496 (Loyd v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Crumley v. Gibbs
99 S.E. 297 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1919)
Barnes v. State
100 S.E. 788 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)