Loyd v. State
This text of 102 S.E. 378 (Loyd v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. It has been repeatedly held by this court and the Supreme Court that where the evidence is conflicting upon the hearing of a motion to change the venue in a criminal ease, the discretion of the trial judge in overruling the motion will not be controlled, unless it is made to appear that there has been an abuse of his discretion. In this case no abuse of the court’s discretion is manifest.
2. No constitutional question is properly raised by the 5th ground of the motion to change the venue.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
102 S.E. 378, 25 Ga. App. 33, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 580, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loyd-v-state-gactapp-1920.