Loy v. Coey
This text of 71 P. 552 (Loy v. Coey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— The respondent moves to dismiss this appeal for the reason that the alleged appeal hond is ineffectual, in that the penalty of said bond, which purports to be an appeal and supersedeas bond, is not double the amount of the judgment and $200, required by the statute for bond on appeal. This case falls squarely within the rule announced in Pierce v. Willeby, 20 Wash. 129 (54 Pac. 999); Town of Sumner v. Rogers, 21 Wash. 361 (58 Pac. 214); Galloway v. Tjossem, 22 Wash. 163 (60 Pac. 129); Beezley v. Sessions, 22 Wash. 125 (60 Pac. 130); and Graham v. American Surely Co., 28 Wash. 735 (69 Pac. 365).
The motion will be sustained, and the appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
71 P. 552, 31 Wash. 684, 1903 Wash. LEXIS 694, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loy-v-coey-wash-1903.