Graham v. American Surety Co.

69 P. 365, 28 Wash. 735, 1902 Wash. LEXIS 544
Washington Supreme Court·Decided June 21, 1902·No. No. 4246·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— The respondents move to dismiss this appeal for the reason that the alleged appeal and supersedeas bond does not render the appeal effectual in that the penalty of said bond, which purports to be both an appeal and a supersedeas bond, is not double the amount of the money judgment appealed from and $200 additional, as required by law. This being true as shown by the record, under the rule announced by this court in Pierce v. Willeby, 20 Wash. 129 [59 Pac. 999), Town of Sumner v. Rogers, 21 Wash. 361 (58 Pac. 214), and Galloway v. Tjossem, 22 Wash. 103 (60 Pac. 129), the motion will be sustained ana the appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Graham v. American Surety Co., 69 P. 365, 28 Wash. 735, 1902 Wash. LEXIS 544 (Wash. 1902).

69 P. 365 (Graham v. American Surety Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Washington Water Power Co. v. Abacus Ass'n
94 P. 1072 (Washington Supreme Court, 1908)
King v. Branscheid
73 P. 668 (Washington Supreme Court, 1903)
Loy v. Coey
71 P. 552 (Washington Supreme Court, 1903)