Lowndes Products, Inc. v. Brower

205 S.E.2d 184, 262 S.C. 431, 1974 S.C. LEXIS 380
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedMay 8, 1974
Docket19821
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 205 S.E.2d 184 (Lowndes Products, Inc. v. Brower) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lowndes Products, Inc. v. Brower, 205 S.E.2d 184, 262 S.C. 431, 1974 S.C. LEXIS 380 (S.C. 1974).

Opinions

Lewis, Justice.

There was an earlier appeal in this case. 259 S. C. 322, 191 S. E. (2d) 761. The order of the lower court in that appeal was affirmed in part and reversed in part as the result of a determination that the defendants who had been employees of the plaintiff were guilty of a breach of their duty of loyalty to their employer. The action was remanded for the determination of the amount of the damages [433]*433sustained by plaintiff. The parties were allowed on remand to rely upon the record already made and also to submit such additional testimony as deemed appropriate on the issue of damages.

After remand, plaintiffs gave notice, under Circuit Court Rule 87 (Vol. 15, pg. 67, Supplement to 1962 Code of Laws), of the taking of depositions of certain named defendants in connection with the determination of the issue of damages and, under Circuit Court Rule 88 (Vol. 15, pg. 72, 1962 Code of Laws), for the production by them of certain records deemed pertinent to that issue. This appeal is from an order of the lower court refusing to compel such discovery.

Although the parties have not raised the question, we dismiss the appeal upon the ground that the order under appeal was an intermediate or interlocutory decision under Section 15-123 of the 1962 Code of Laws, and is not appealable before final judgment. Wallace v. Interamerican Trust Co., 246 S. C. 563, 144 S. E. (2d) 813.

This is in accord with the rule that, ordinarily, an order denying or compelling discovery is not directly appealable. Annotation: 37 A. L. R. (2d) 586; 4 Am. Jur. (2d), Appeal and Error, Sections 79 & 80.

The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Moss, C. J., and Bussey, Brailsford and Littlejohn, JJ-, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barnhouse v. Barnhouse
Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2018
Laffitte v. Bridgestone Corp.
674 S.E.2d 154 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2009)
Estate of King v. Richland County and Prison Health Services
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2008
Wieters v. Bon-Secours-St. Francis Xavier Hospital, Inc.
662 S.E.2d 430 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2008)
Wieters v. BON-SECOURS-ST. FRANCIS XAVIER HOSP.
662 S.E.2d 430 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2008)
BB & T v. Pender
625 S.E.2d 205 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2005)
Ex Parte Wilson
625 S.E.2d 205 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2005)
Babb v. Scott
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2005
Gal ex rel. Hagins v. Whetstone
347 S.E.2d 881 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1986)
Ex Parte Whetstone
347 S.E.2d 881 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1986)
Patterson v. Specter Broadcasting Corp.
335 S.E.2d 803 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1985)
Clark v. Ross
328 S.E.2d 91 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1985)
Lowndes Products, Inc. v. Brower
205 S.E.2d 184 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
205 S.E.2d 184, 262 S.C. 431, 1974 S.C. LEXIS 380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lowndes-products-inc-v-brower-sc-1974.