Lowenstein v. Commissioner
This text of 5 B.T.A. 208 (Lowenstein v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[209]*209OPINION.
The petition alleged that the taxpayer employed a chauffeur for business purposes and paid him $700 per year on account of such employment during the taxable year. The salary of the chauffeur was disallowed by the Commissioner upon the ground that it was not an ordinary and necessary business expense but was a personal living or family expense. ■
The answer of the Commissioner makes no admission of facts, except the jurisdictional allegations in the petition. In view of the fact that the material facts alleged in the petition were not sustained by evidence, the determination of the Commissioner must be approved.
Judgment will be entered for the Commissioner.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 B.T.A. 208, 1926 BTA LEXIS 2919, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lowenstein-v-commissioner-bta-1926.