Lowe v. Union Trust Co.

177 N.E. 767, 123 Ohio St. 688, 123 Ohio St. (N.S.) 688, 1931 Ohio LEXIS 326
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lowe v. Union Trust Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 10 Ohio Law. Abs. 702
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 13, 1931·No. 22330·Published

Opinion

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said Court of Appeals be, and the same is hereby affirmed. The. jurisdiction of the municipal court to hear and determine an action of forcible entry and detainer against the occupant of premises is not wanting by reason of the claimed pendency of the partition case through which the plaintiff in the forcible entry and detainer action had acquired his title; it appearing that a final order *689 in the partition case had been made prior to the institution of the forcible entry and detainer action.

Judgment affirmed.

Jones, Matthias, Day and Kinkade, JJ., concur. Marshall, C. J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lowe v. Union Trust Co., 177 N.E. 767, 123 Ohio St. 688, 123 Ohio St. (N.S.) 688, 1931 Ohio LEXIS 326 (Ohio 1931).

177 N.E. 767 (Lowe v. Union Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.