Lowe v. Union Trust Co.
This text of 177 N.E. 767 (Lowe v. Union Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said Court of Appeals be, and the same is hereby affirmed. The. jurisdiction of the municipal court to hear and determine an action of forcible entry and detainer against the occupant of premises is not wanting by reason of the claimed pendency of the partition case through which the plaintiff in the forcible entry and detainer action had acquired his title; it appearing that a final order *689 in the partition case had been made prior to the institution of the forcible entry and detainer action.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
177 N.E. 767, 123 Ohio St. 688, 123 Ohio St. (N.S.) 688, 1931 Ohio LEXIS 326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lowe-v-union-trust-co-ohio-1931.