Lowe v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Lowe v. State

122 So. 2d 386, 271 Ala. 699, 1960 Ala. LEXIS 424

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided July 14, 1960·No. 7 Div. 407·Published

Opinion

COLEMAN, Justice.

Upon mature deliberation and after careful consideration of the application for certiorari, we are of opinion that the writ was improvidently issued, .that the conclusion reached by the Court of Appeals is correct, and that the judgment of that court is due [700] to be affirmed. See: National Casualty Co. v. Dunn, 209 Ala. 484, 96 So. 576; Ex parte Corona Coal Co., 213 Ala. 554, 105 So. 718; Connelly v. State, 30 Ala.App. 91, 1 So.2d 606, certiorari denied 241 Ala. 132, 1 So.2d 608; Nobles v. State, 30 Ala.App. 434, 7 So.2d 770, certiorari denied 242 Ala. 643, 7 So.2d 773.

Affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COLEMAN, Justice.

Upon mature deliberation and after careful consideration of the application for certiorari, we are of opinion that the writ was improvidently issued, .that the conclusion reached by the Court of Appeals is correct, and that the judgment of that court is due [700] to be affirmed. See: National Casualty Co. v. Dunn, 209 Ala. 484, 96 So. 576; Ex parte Corona Coal Co., 213 Ala. 554, 105 So. 718; Connelly v. State, 30 Ala.App. 91, 1 So.2d 606, certiorari denied 241 Ala. 132, 1 So.2d 608; Nobles v. State, 30 Ala.App. 434, 7 So.2d 770, certiorari denied 242 Ala. 643, 7 So.2d 773.

Affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Lowe v. State, 122 So. 2d 386, 271 Ala. 699, 1960 Ala. LEXIS 424 (Ala. 1960).

Pincite

122 So. 2d 386 (Lowe v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related