Lowe v. State
This text of 122 So. 2d 386 (Lowe v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon mature deliberation and after careful consideration of the application for certiorari, we are of opinion that the writ was improvidently issued, .that the conclusion reached by the Court of Appeals is correct, and that the judgment of that court is due [700]*700to be affirmed. See: National Casualty Co. v. Dunn, 209 Ala. 484, 96 So. 576; Ex parte Corona Coal Co., 213 Ala. 554, 105 So. 718; Connelly v. State, 30 Ala.App. 91, 1 So.2d 606, certiorari denied 241 Ala. 132, 1 So.2d 608; Nobles v. State, 30 Ala.App. 434, 7 So.2d 770, certiorari denied 242 Ala. 643, 7 So.2d 773.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
122 So. 2d 386, 271 Ala. 699, 1960 Ala. LEXIS 424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lowe-v-state-ala-1960.