Corona Coal Co. v. Sexton

105 So. 718, 213 Ala. 554, 1925 Ala. LEXIS 430
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided October 15, 1925·No. 6 Div. 505.·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

No reversible error is found in the opinion and decision of the Court of Appeals. The court here notes, however, its opinion that the allowance of the question made the subject of appellants’ assignment of error No. 2 on the record of appeal to the Court of Appeals was not error, and that the authority of the decision of this court in National Casualty Co. v. Dunn, 209 Ala. 484, 96 So. 576, where it was held that repeated objections to questions attempting to elicit illegal evidence are not necessary to raise the point on appeal, is not to be considered as impaired by the refusal of the writ in this case.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. X, and SAYRE, GARDNER, and MILLER, JJ., .concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Corona Coal Co. v. Sexton, 105 So. 718, 213 Ala. 554, 1925 Ala. LEXIS 430 (Ala. 1925).

105 So. 718 (Corona Coal Co. v. Sexton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lowe v. State
122 So. 2d 386 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1960)
Eason v. State
4 So. 2d 190 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1941)
All States Life Ins. Co. v. Kelso
195 So. 460 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1940)
Merchants' Bank v. Sherman
110 So. 805 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1926)