Lowden v. Graham

9 A.2d 659, 136 Me. 341, 1939 Me. LEXIS 44
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedDecember 6, 1939
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 9 A.2d 659 (Lowden v. Graham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lowden v. Graham, 9 A.2d 659, 136 Me. 341, 1939 Me. LEXIS 44 (Me. 1939).

Opinion

Manser, J.

On report. Title to a lot of land in the Town of Boothbay, Maine, is involved. The plaintiff claims under a deed from the former owner. The defendant claims this deed was ineffectual to convey title as the land in question had previously been sold for delinquent taxes to the Town of Boothbay and by it later conveyed to the defendant. The plaintiff attacks the validity of the tax sale in two particulars. If either of these points is sustained, the stipulation is that the plaintiff shall be entitled to judgment with nominal damages and costs. If neither of the points is sustained, then the defendant prevails and is entitled to judgment and costs. The first question presented to the Court is :

1. Was the tax sale in question at the place where the last preceding annual town meeting was held under the statute?

The taxpayer was a non-resident owner and the statutory provision relating to sales of real estate for taxes is found in R. S., Chap. 14, Sec. 72, as follows:

“If the taxes, interest and charges are not paid on or before such first Monday in February, so much of the estate as is sufficient to pay the amount due therefor with interest and charges will be sold without further notice, at public auction, on said first Monday in February, at nine o’clock in the forenoon, at the office of the collector of taxes, in cities, and at the place where the last preceding annual town meeting was held, in towns.”

It is the contention of the plaintiff that there was non-compliance with this requirement of the statute. It was stipulated and agreed that the last preceding annual town meeting was held in the town hall and that the tax sale was held at the town office. It becomes material to consider carefully the facts existent in the present case, and which are not disputed, to determine whether the town office can prop[343]*343erly and legally be regarded as the place where the last preceding annual town meeting was held.

The town building is located on a plot of land bordering on a state highway and with open space about it convenient for the parking of automobiles. A plan drawn to scale was used as an exhibit. It is here reproduced in miniature:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thompson v. Gaudette
92 A.2d 342 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 A.2d 659, 136 Me. 341, 1939 Me. LEXIS 44, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lowden-v-graham-me-1939.