Bornemann v. Norris

47 F. 438, 1891 U.S. App. LEXIS 1452
CourtUnited States Circuit Court for the Northern District of Florida
DecidedJune 19, 1891
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 47 F. 438 (Bornemann v. Norris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Circuit Court for the Northern District of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bornemann v. Norris, 47 F. 438, 1891 U.S. App. LEXIS 1452 (circtndfl 1891).

Opinion

Lamar, Justice.

This cause came on to be heard upon a motion to quash execution issued herein, and to set aside the levy under execution, for reasons on file, and after notice to parties interested, and was argued by Messrs. If. K. Foster and B. M. Miller, attorneys for movers, and Mr. J. M. Barrs, attorney for plaintiff; whereupon, the court being of opinion that, under the law of the United States relating to the sales of property taken under execution in common-law cases pending in this court, and particularly where required by the defendant in execution, the sales of lands seized under execution should be made at the door of the court-house in the county in which the lands are situated, it is ordered that the advertisement made by the marshal in this case of property seized in Volusia county, state of Florida, be, and the same is hereby, quashed, and that the marshal proceed under the execution in his hands in this case to advertise and sell the property seized according to law, unless otherwise restrained by orders from this court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lowden v. Graham
9 A.2d 659 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
47 F. 438, 1891 U.S. App. LEXIS 1452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bornemann-v-norris-circtndfl-1891.