Lovisa Construction Co. v. City of New York
505 N.E.2d 951, 69 N.Y.2d 801, 513 N.Y.S.2d 386, 1987 N.Y. LEXIS 15397
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division in Naclerio Contr. Co. v City of New York (116 AD2d 463, affd 69 NY2d 794 [decided herewith]) and the question certified answered in the affirmative.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lovisa Construction Co. v. City of New York, 505 N.E.2d 951, 69 N.Y.2d 801, 513 N.Y.S.2d 386, 1987 N.Y. LEXIS 15397 (N.Y. 1987).
505 N.E.2d 951 (Lovisa Construction Co. v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. New York City Transit Authority, Metropolitan Transportation Authority
990 F.2d 76 (Second Circuit, 1993)
Thomas Crimmins Contracting Co. v. City of New York
138 A.D.2d 138 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Grow Tunneling Corp. v. City of New York
512 N.E.2d 541 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)