Love v. State
This text of 909 S.W.2d 515 (Love v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Appellant was convicted of Theft and his punishment assessed at confinement for one [516]*516year. The Third Court of Appeals affirmed in Love v. State, (Tex.App.—Austin, No. 03-92-538-CR, delivered September 14, 1994). We granted discretionary review to test the vitality of our holding in Eisenhauer v. State, 754 S.W.2d 159 (Tex.Crim.App.1988) after Heitman v. State, 815 S.W.2d 681 (Tex.Crim.App.1991). However, it now appears that our decision to do so was improvident. Accordingly, the instant cause is hereby dismissed. As always, refusal or dismissal of a petition for discretionary review implies no decision on the merits.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
909 S.W.2d 515, 1995 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 108, 1995 WL 654452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/love-v-state-texcrimapp-1995.