Love v. State

515 So. 2d 364, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2614
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 12, 1987·No. 4-86-2388, 4-86-2421·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

515 So.2d 364 (1987)

Terrance LOVE, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 4-86-2388, 4-86-2421.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

November 12, 1987.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Jeffrey L. Anderson, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Jr., Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Diane

E. Leeds, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant's convictions and the revocation of probation but reverse the appellant's sentence because we find that three out of the four reasons given by the trial court for deviating from the sentencing guidelines are improper. The fourth reason, concerning an escalating pattern of criminal behavior, is legally valid and factually supported by the appellant's juvenile record. See Williams v. State, 504 So.2d 392 (Fla. 1987).

Accordingly, this cause is remanded to the trial court for resentencing in accord with Albritton v. State, 476 So.2d 158 (Fla. 1985).

ANSTEAD, LETTS and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Love v. State, 515 So. 2d 364, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2614 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

515 So. 2d 364 (Love v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Love v. State
559 So. 2d 198 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)
Hall v. State
549 So. 2d 758 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Love v. State
532 So. 2d 1133 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Smith v. State
515 So. 2d 1056 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)