Love v. State
This text of 515 So. 2d 364 (Love v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Terrance LOVE, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Jeffrey L. Anderson, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Jr., Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Diane
E. Leeds, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm appellant's convictions and the revocation of probation but reverse the appellant's sentence because we find that three out of the four reasons given by the trial court for deviating from the sentencing guidelines are improper. The fourth reason, concerning an escalating pattern of criminal behavior, is legally valid and factually supported by the appellant's juvenile record. See Williams v. State, 504 So.2d 392 (Fla. 1987).
Accordingly, this cause is remanded to the trial court for resentencing in accord with Albritton v. State, 476 So.2d 158 (Fla. 1985).
ANSTEAD, LETTS and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
515 So. 2d 364, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2614, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/love-v-state-fladistctapp-1987.