Hall v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hall v. State

542 So. 2d 1071, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1210, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2628, 1989 WL 50266

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 17, 1989

DocketNo. 88-2654

StatusPublished

This text of 542 So. 2d 1071 (Hall v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hall v. State, 542 So. 2d 1071, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1210, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2628, 1989 WL 50266 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a summary denial of appellant’s motion for post conviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

While several of appellant’s claims are not cognizable under the mentioned rule, there are two grounds that merit attention.

We reverse and remand with instructions to either conduct an evidentiary hearing upon appellant’s motion or attach those portions of the record which show that appellant is entitled to no relief, all with reference to appellant’s claim of ineffectiveness of trial counsel, and his claim that the imposition of a fine at his resentencing was illegal.

REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

ANSTEAD, LETTS and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI