Love v. Stalder

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-30936 Conference Calendar __________________

ROBERT E. LOVE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

RICHARD L. STALDER, Secretary; JOHN P. WHITLEY, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY; DARREL VANNOY; A.J. DUNN, Major,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 93-CV-1108 - - - - - - - - - - April 17, 1996 Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Robert E. Love appeals from the district court's entry of

summary judgment for the defendants in his civil rights suit.

Love has filed a request with this court for leave to proceed in

forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal. Love argues that he was

improperly classified to a punitive disciplinary camp rather than

to a "protected custody extended lockdown," thus denying him his

Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 95-30936 -2-

rights to due process and equal protection under the law. This

is not a nonfrivolous issue for appeal. See Sandin v. Conner,

115 S. Ct. 2293, 2300 (1995). Accordingly, the motion to proceed

IFP on appeal is DENIED and the APPEAL is DISMISSED. See 5th

Cir. R. 42.2.