Love v. Stalder
This text of Love v. Stalder (Love v. Stalder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 95-31034 USDC No. CA-94-2556 __________________
ROBERT E. LOVE,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
RICHARD L. STALDER ET AL.,
Defendants-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana - - - - - - - - - - - December 19, 1995 Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Robert E. Love moves this Court for leave to proceed in
forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal. He has failed to present a
nonfrivolous appellate issue regarding why he failed to make a
good-faith effort to exhaust prison administrative remedies.
Because Love's motion for IFP presents no issue of arguable
merit and is thus frivolous, IFP is DENIED. Because the appeal
is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Love v. Stalder, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/love-v-stalder-ca5-1995.