Love v. Love

370 So. 2d 1231
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 16, 1979
Docket78-112
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 370 So. 2d 1231 (Love v. Love) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Love v. Love, 370 So. 2d 1231 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

Opinion

370 So.2d 1231 (1979)

Nancy LOVE, Appellant,
v.
James Gordon LOVE, Appellee.

No. 78-112.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 16, 1979.

Walter Komanski, Legal Aid Soc., Orlando, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

MOORE, Judge.

In this appeal appellant contends that the trial judge abused his discretion in denying her request for attorney's fees. In doing so the judge stated in the judgment:

"The court further finds that the respondent was referred by the Orange County Legal Aid Society to Attorney James N. Powers and as a result was represented by the Legal Aid Society through James N. Powers as a public service performed by a member of the Bar, upon the premise that neither party has the ability to compensate an attorney for the wife, and as a consequence the claim for an attorney's fee is hereby denied."

It is readily apparent that the `premise' referred to above is that of the Legal Aid Society and not that of the judge. No finding was made by the court as to the appellant's need for, or the appellee's ability to pay, attorney's fees.

As to an award of attorney's fees, we see no reasonable basis on which to distinguish a client of a Legal Aid Society from one who retains private counsel. Accordingly, the judgment is reversed and this cause remanded with instructions to determine the need for attorney's fees and the appellee's ability to pay same. Assuming the judge finds that appellant is entitled to such an award, he shall determine the amount thereof.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DOWNEY, C.J., and LETTS, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nadia Gihar Bahta v. Mohammed Seid Mohammed
Court of Appeals of Virginia, 2019
Henriquez v. Henriquez
971 A.2d 345 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 2009)
Altman v. Altman
873 So. 2d 523 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
In Re Marriage of Ward
3 Cal. App. 4th 618 (California Court of Appeal, 1992)
Hayes v. Ward
3 Cal. App. 4th 618 (California Court of Appeal, 1992)
Benavides v. Benavides
526 A.2d 536 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1987)
Davis v. Redwood Apartments, Ltd.
20 Fla. Supp. 2d 105 (Florida Circuit Courts, 1986)
In Re Marriage of Gaddis
632 S.W.2d 326 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1982)
Butler v. Butler
376 So. 2d 287 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Kadar v. State
370 So. 2d 1231 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
370 So. 2d 1231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/love-v-love-fladistctapp-1979.