Davis v. Redwood Apartments, Ltd.

20 Fla. Supp. 2d 105
CourtCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida
DecidedSeptember 24, 1986
DocketAppeal Nos. L-507 and L-508
StatusPublished

This text of 20 Fla. Supp. 2d 105 (Davis v. Redwood Apartments, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davis v. Redwood Apartments, Ltd., 20 Fla. Supp. 2d 105 (Fla. Super. Ct. 1986).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

OLIVER L. GREEN, JR., Circuit Judge.

The appellants’ Motions for consolidated of the above appeals are granted.

The appellants bring these appeals from orders of the trial Judge [106]*106denying awards of attorneys fees, as provided for in Section 83.48 Florida Statutes. The appellants were the successful litigants in Landlord and Tenant actions below.

The trial Judge determined that the subject statute provided for “recovery” of attorney fees to “the party”, and since the appellants did not incur the responsibility for paying fees, neither should they recover any such fees. Furthermore, the trial Judge determined that the fees would not inure to the benefit of the appellants, but would go into a public revenue fund which finances the Florida Rural Legal Services Office.

While the statute is worded so as to allow a trial Judge certain discretions, it is not to be so narrowly interpreted so as to bar recovery of attorney fees under the instant circumstances. Love v. Love, 370 So. 2d 1231 (4th DCA 1979); and Butler v. Butler, 376 So.2d 287 (5th DCA 1979).

Similar issues raided in Federal appeals have been resolved favorable to the appellants. Sellera v. Woolman, 510 F.2d 119 (5th Cir. 1975); Blum v. Stenson, 104 S.Ct. 1541 (1984); Rodriques v. Taylor, 569 F.2d 1231, 1235 (3rd Cir. 1977); Dennis v. Chang, 611 F. 2d 1302, 1306 (9th Cir. 1980); Shadis v. Beal, 685 F.2d 824, 830 (3rd Cir.) Cert. denied, 1035 Ct. 300 (1982); and, Riddell v. National Democratic Party, 624 F.2d 539, 543 (5th Cir. 1980).

No purpose would be served by entertaining oral argument. The orders of the learned trial judge are reversed and these actions are remanded for further proceedings pursuant to this opinion.

DATED: September 24th, 1986.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blum v. Stenson
465 U.S. 886 (Supreme Court, 1984)
Love v. Love
370 So. 2d 1231 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Butler v. Butler
376 So. 2d 287 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Dennis v. Chang
611 F.2d 1302 (Ninth Circuit, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 Fla. Supp. 2d 105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-redwood-apartments-ltd-flacirct-1986.