LOVE-EL v. State

245 S.W.3d 924, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 248, 2008 WL 426259

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Jimmy Love-El, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, movant argues that his counsel coerced him into entering his guilty plea.

The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).