James v. City of St. Louis

Missouri Court of Appeals

James v. City of St. Louis

245 S.W.3d 924, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 244, 2008 WL 426255

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 19, 2008

DocketED 89513

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 245 S.W.3d 924 (James v. City of St. Louis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James v. City of St. Louis, 245 S.W.3d 924, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 244, 2008 WL 426255 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Essie James appeals from the judgment in favor of City of St. Louis (City) entered by the trial court upon the granting of City’s motion for summary judgment in James’s personal injury lawsuit arising from her fall from a chair at Lambert-St. Louis International Airport (Airport). 1

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. Upon de novo review, we find no genuine issue of material fact or error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1

. City’s motion to strike James’s brief and dismiss the appeal is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI