James v. City of St. Louis

245 S.W.3d 924, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 244, 2008 WL 426255
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 19, 2008·No. ED 89513·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Essie James appeals from the judgment in favor of City of St. Louis (City) entered by the trial court upon the granting of City’s motion for summary judgment in James’s personal injury lawsuit arising from her fall from a chair at Lambert-St. Louis International Airport (Airport). 1

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. Upon de novo review, we find no genuine issue of material fact or error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1

. City’s motion to strike James’s brief and dismiss the appeal is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James v. City of St. Louis, 245 S.W.3d 924, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 244, 2008 WL 426255 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

245 S.W.3d 924 (James v. City of St. Louis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

LOVE-EL v. State
245 S.W.3d 924 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)