Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Mink

180 Ky. 294
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Mink. Read the opinion of the Court — 168 Ky. 394
Court of Appeals of Kentucky·Decided April 28, 1918·Published

Opinion

Opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice Settle

Overruling appellant’s motion to correct judgment.

. As the motion of appellant to correct the judgment of affirmance in this case by setting aside so much thereof as awards appellee damages on the amount of the judgment of the lower court superseded by it, raises the same question this day considered and decided, adversely to the appellant’s contention, in the case of Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company v. Noble Steele, By, etc., 180 Ky. 290, and the opinion therein must control the decision asked in this case, the appellant’s motion herein to correct the judgment must therefore be and is overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Mink, 180 Ky. 294 (Ky. Ct. App. 1918).

180 Ky. 294 (Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Mink) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Steele
202 S.W. 878 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1918)