Louisville Country Club, Inc. v. William M. Gray, District Director of Internal Revenue

Sixth Circuit

Louisville Country Club, Inc. v. William M. Gray, District Director of Internal Revenue

285 F.2d 532, 7 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1843, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 3029

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided December 15, 1960·No. 14109·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The taxpayer, Louisville Country Club, Inc., on behalf of its individual members, brought suit in the United States District Court to recover excise taxes paid on a 1956 assessment, levied on its membership to provide funds for improvement of the club property. The issue is whether the assessment should be subjected to the twenty percent excise tax imposed upon club dues by Section 4241(a) (1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, 26 U.S.C.A. § 4241(a) (1).

The case was tried on a stipulation of facts and submitted for decision on the motions for summary judgment filed, respectively, by the appellant taxpayer and the appellee District Director of Internal Revenue.

Thoughtful consideration has been given to the oral arguments and briefs of attorneys and to the facts of the case in relation to applicable law. The conclusion has been reached that the judgment of United States District Judge Brooks granting the motion of the defendant District Director and dismissing the complaint of the plaintiff taxpayer should, for the reasons stated in the memorandum opinion of Judge Brooks, 178 F.Supp. 915, be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The taxpayer, Louisville Country Club, Inc., on behalf of its individual members, brought suit in the United States District Court to recover excise taxes paid on a 1956 assessment, levied on its membership to provide funds for improvement of the club property. The issue is whether the assessment should be subjected to the twenty percent excise tax imposed upon club dues by Section 4241(a) (1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, 26 U.S.C.A. § 4241(a) (1).

The case was tried on a stipulation of facts and submitted for decision on the motions for summary judgment filed, respectively, by the appellant taxpayer and the appellee District Director of Internal Revenue.

Thoughtful consideration has been given to the oral arguments and briefs of attorneys and to the facts of the case in relation to applicable law. The conclusion has been reached that the judgment of United States District Judge Brooks granting the motion of the defendant District Director and dismissing the complaint of the plaintiff taxpayer should, for the reasons stated in the memorandum opinion of Judge Brooks, 178 F.Supp. 915, be affirmed.

Louisville Country Club, Inc. v. William M. Gray, District Director of Internal Revenue, 285 F.2d 532, 7 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1843, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 3029 (6th Cir. 1960).

Pincite

285 F.2d 532 (Louisville Country Club, Inc. v. William M. Gray, District Director of Internal Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related