Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. White

568 So. 2d 1070, 1990 La. LEXIS 2622, 1990 WL 175259
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided November 9, 1990·No. No. 87-B-2024·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In re Murphy J. White, applying for motion for interpretation, direction and instruction.

Motion granted. The rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement are applicable only to disciplinary proceedings pending on April 1, 1990 in which a commissioner’s hearing has not been held. Since the commissioner’s hearing in this case was held prior to April 1, 1990, the new rules are not applicable. After respondent's unconditional suspension has been served, he will be eligible for readmission without following the procedure for reinstatement in the new rules.

DENNIS and COLE, JJ., disagree with the order and are of the opinion that Supreme Court Rule, Sections 23 et seq. are properly applicable to this proceeding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. White, 568 So. 2d 1070, 1990 La. LEXIS 2622, 1990 WL 175259 (La. 1990).

568 So. 2d 1070 (Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Riley
599 So. 2d 292 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1992)
In re Wilkinson
587 So. 2d 686 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1991)