Louis v. State

252 So. 3d 779
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Louis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 240 So. 3d 705
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 5, 2018·No. No. 3D18–0978·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

*780Affirmed. See Rodriguez v. State, 223 So.3d 1095, 1097 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) ("The record, which includes the plea colloquy, clearly refutes these claims, and under Florida law, a defendant is bound by the statements he makes under oath during a plea colloquy.") (citing Henry v. State, 920 So.2d 1245, 1246 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) ); see also Fultz v. State, 218 So.3d 924, 925 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016) (affirming the trial court's order denying the defendant's Rule 3.850 postconviction motion because "all of [the defendant's] claims are refuted by the record.").

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Louis v. State, 252 So. 3d 779 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

252 So. 3d 779 (Louis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fultz v. State
218 So. 3d 924 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Rodriguez v. State
223 So. 3d 1095 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
Henry v. State
920 So. 2d 1245 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)