Louis v. State

243 So. 3d 445
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Louis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 240 So. 3d 705
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 15, 2017·No. No. 3D17–1425·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Maxwell v. State, 69 So.3d 1122 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) ; Wesley v. State, 126 So.3d 389 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) ; Ross v. State, 82 So.3d 975 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) ; Harricharan v. State, 59 So.3d 1162 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011). See also Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(b)(2) (no motion filed under this rule shall be considered if filed more than two years after the judgment and sentence become final unless the motion alleges, inter alia, that "the fundamental constitutional right asserted was not established within the period provided for herein and has been held to apply retroactively, and the claim is made within 2 years of the date of the mandate of the decision announcing the retroactivity").

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Louis v. State, 243 So. 3d 445 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

243 So. 3d 445 (Louis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ross v. State
82 So. 3d 975 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Wesley v. State
126 So. 3d 389 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Harricharan v. State
59 So. 3d 1162 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Maxwell v. State
69 So. 3d 1122 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)