Louis v. State

884 So. 2d 302, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 12098, 2004 WL 1837930
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 18, 2004
DocketNo. 4D04-2549
StatusPublished

This text of 884 So. 2d 302 (Louis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Louis v. State, 884 So. 2d 302, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 12098, 2004 WL 1837930 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed, without prejudice to appellant’s rights to refile his motion, for post-conviction relief, in the time remaining under the law, alleging the necessary facts to support his claim of affirmative misadvice of counsel under Smith v. State, 784 So.2d 460 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). See Bivens v. State, 840 So.2d 355 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003).

FARMER, C.J., GUNTHER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. State
784 So. 2d 460 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Bivens v. State
840 So. 2d 355 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
884 So. 2d 302, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 12098, 2004 WL 1837930, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louis-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.