Louis v. State
831 So. 2d 762, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 17535, 2002 WL 31662572
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 27, 2002·No. No. 4D00-4175·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Washington Louis seeks reversal of the trial court’s revocation of his probation, arguing that the evidence was insufficient and that the admission of hearsay testimony violated his constitutional right to confront witnesses against him. We affirm the revocation of Louis’ probation, but remand the case for entry of a written order of revocation. See, e.g., Mitchell v. State, 717 So.2d 609 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Louis v. State, 831 So. 2d 762, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 17535, 2002 WL 31662572 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
831 So. 2d 762 (Louis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Thomas v. State
831 So. 2d 762 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)