Louis v. State
This text of 820 So. 2d 1031 (Louis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Neither the state’s response to our order to show cause, nor the record before us, conclusively refutes appellant’s allegation that he was not advised of potential deportation consequences of his plea in case number 95-12161 CFA02. Accordingly, we remand for attachment of those portions of the record which conclusively refute appellant’s claim, or for an eviden-tiary hearing.
concurring specially.
I concur in the majority opinion but additionally note that Appellant has alleged resulting prejudice by swearing that he has been “placed in” deportation proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
820 So. 2d 1031, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9421, 2002 WL 1431390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louis-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.