Louis Ortega v. A. Boyd Puccinelli

Ninth Circuit

Louis Ortega v. A. Boyd Puccinelli

444 F.2d 530, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9583

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJune 15, 1971

Docket26894

StatusPublished

This text of 444 F.2d 530 (Louis Ortega v. A. Boyd Puccinelli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Louis Ortega v. A. Boyd Puccinelli, 444 F.2d 530, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9583 (9th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The dismissal of appellant’s “Petition for a Writ of Prohibition” against a bail bondsman is affirmed.

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a), a writ of prohibition may issue only in aid of the jurisdiction of the issuing court. Stafford v. Superior Court, 272 F.2d 407, 409 (9th Cir. 1959). Appellant’s petition does not assert any underlying action concerning which the district court would have jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The dismissal of appellant’s “Petition for a Writ of Prohibition” against a bail bondsman is affirmed.

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a), a writ of prohibition may issue only in aid of the jurisdiction of the issuing court. Stafford v. Superior Court, 272 F.2d 407, 409 (9th Cir. 1959). Appellant’s petition does not assert any underlying action concerning which the district court would have jurisdiction.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

444 F.2d 530, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louis-ortega-v-a-boyd-puccinelli-ca9-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack