Lotus Development Corp. v. Borland International, Inc.

516 U.S. 1040, 116 S. Ct. 695, 133 L. Ed. 2d 653, 64 U.S.L.W. 3465, 1996 U.S. LEXIS 453
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lotus Development Corp. v. Borland International, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 516 U.S. 233
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 8, 1996·No. No. 94-2003·Published

Opinion

C. A. 1st Cir. [Certiorari granted, 515 U. S. 1191.] Motions of Howard C. Anawalt and Software Protection Committee of Minnesota Intellectual Property Law Association for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted.

Justice Stevens took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lotus Development Corp. v. Borland International, Inc., 516 U.S. 1040, 116 S. Ct. 695, 133 L. Ed. 2d 653, 64 U.S.L.W. 3465, 1996 U.S. LEXIS 453 (1996).

516 U.S. 1040 (Lotus Development Corp. v. Borland International, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.