Home/Supreme Court/Lotus Development Corp. v. Borland International, Inc.

Lotus Development Corp. v. Borland International, Inc.

515 U.S. 1191, 116 S. Ct. 39, 132 L. Ed. 2d 921, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7556, 64 U.S.L.W. 3238, 1995 U.S. LEXIS 5218
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided September 27, 1995·No. No. 94-2003·Published·Cited by 34 cases

Opinion

C. A. 1st Cir. Motions of Intellectual Property Owners and Information Technology Industry Council for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted. Certiorari granted. Brief of petitioner is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Thursday, November 9, 1995. Brief of respondent is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Friday, December 8, 1995. A reply brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Thursday, December 28, 1995. This Court’s Rule 29.2 does not apply. Justice Stevens took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions and this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lotus Development Corp. v. Borland International, Inc., 515 U.S. 1191, 116 S. Ct. 39, 132 L. Ed. 2d 921, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7556, 64 U.S.L.W. 3238, 1995 U.S. LEXIS 5218 (1995).

515 U.S. 1191 (Lotus Development Corp. v. Borland International, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tingley Systems, Inc. v. CSC Consulting, Inc.
152 F. Supp. 2d 95 (D. Massachusetts, 2001)
Genentech, Inc. v. Boehringer Mannheim GmbH
989 F. Supp. 359 (D. Massachusetts, 1997)
LRC Electronics, Inc. v. John Mezzalingua Associates, Inc.
974 F. Supp. 171 (N.D. New York, 1997)
Roton Barrier, Inc. And Austin R. Baer v. The Stanley Works
79 F.3d 1112 (Federal Circuit, 1996)
Amhil Enterprises Ltd. v. Wawa, Inc., Dba Wawa Food Market, and M & N Plastics, Inc. And Ivonis Mazzarolo
81 F.3d 1554 (Federal Circuit, 1996)
Novo Nordisk of North America, Inc., Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Novo Nordisk, A/s v. Genentech, Inc.
77 F.3d 1364 (Federal Circuit, 1996)
Colgate Palmolive Co. v. W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
919 F. Supp. 767 (D. New Jersey, 1996)
Circle R, Inc. v. Smithco Mfg., Inc.
919 F. Supp. 1272 (N.D. Iowa, 1996)
Hoechst Celanese Corporation v. Bp Chemicals Limited and Sterling Chemicals, Inc.
78 F.3d 1575 (Federal Circuit, 1996)
Thermalloy Inc. v. Aavid Engineering, Inc.
935 F. Supp. 55 (D. New Hampshire, 1996)
Environetics, Inc. v. Millipore Corp.
923 F. Supp. 344 (D. Connecticut, 1996)
Exxon Chemical Patents, Inc., Exxon Corporation and Exxon Research and Engineering Co. v. Lubrizol Corporation
77 F.3d 450 (Federal Circuit, 1996)
National Presto Industries, Inc. v. The West Bend Company, Defendant/cross-Appellant
76 F.3d 1185 (Federal Circuit, 1996)
Monroe Engineering Products, Inc. v. J.W. Winco, Inc.
915 F. Supp. 901 (E.D. Michigan, 1996)
Modine Manufacturing Company v. United States International Trade Commission
75 F.3d 1545 (Federal Circuit, 1996)
Modine Manufacturing Co. v. United States International Trade Commission
75 F.3d 1545 (Federal Circuit, 1996)
Lifescan, Inc. v. Home Diagnostics, Inc.
76 F.3d 358 (Federal Circuit, 1996)
Sofamor Danek Group, Inc. v. Depuy-Motech, Inc.
74 F.3d 1216 (Federal Circuit, 1996)
Imazio Nursery, Inc. v. Dania Greenhouses, and Coastal Nursery, Jess Rodrigues, and Donna Rodrigues
69 F.3d 1560 (Federal Circuit, 1996)
General Mills v. Hunt-Wesson, Inc.
917 F. Supp. 663 (D. Minnesota, 1996)