Lott v. State
This text of 865 So. 2d 637 (Lott v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Clarence LOTT, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
WHATLEY, Judge.
Clarence Lott seeks review of the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). The trial court summarily denied his motion without any explanation or record attachments. It also failed to inform Lott of his right to appeal within thirty days. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for reconsideration of Lott's motion in accordance with our opinion in Suleiman v. State, 861 So.2d 1175 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). If the trial court again summarily denies the motion, it must set forth its rationale and attach any relevant portions of the record which support its denial.
Reversed and remanded.
SILBERMAN and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
865 So. 2d 637, 2004 WL 241469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lott-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.