Lost Creek Ventures, LLC D/B/A Happy Bulldog Management Stephan Epstein And Marilyn Roth Epstein v. Alan Pilgrim

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 31, 2015·No. 01-15-00375-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Lost Creek Ventures, LLC d/b/a Happy Bulldog Management;

Stephan Epstein; and Marilyn Roth Epstein v. Alan Pilgrim

Appellate case number: 01-15-00375-CV

Trial court case number: C-1-CV-12-007660

Trial court: County Court at Law No. 2 of Travis County

On December 15, 2015, Appellee Alan Pilgrim filed a motion to dismiss Appellant Lost Creek Ventures LLC from this appeal on the basis that a non-attorney corporate officer cannot represent a corporation “pro se.” On December 23, 2015, Lost Creek Ventures filed a response indicating that it has retained a licensed attorney to represent it in this appeal. Accordingly, the motion to dismiss Lost Creek Ventures from this appeal is dismissed as moot.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jane Bland  Acting individually

Date: December 31, 2015

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lost Creek Ventures, LLC D/B/A Happy Bulldog Management Stephan Epstein And Marilyn Roth Epstein v. Alan Pilgrim, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Lost Creek Ventures, LLC D/B/A Happy Bulldog Management Stephan Epstein And Marilyn Roth Epstein v. Alan Pilgrim (Lost Creek Ventures, LLC D/B/A Happy Bulldog Management Stephan Epstein And Marilyn Roth Epstein v. Alan Pilgrim) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.