Lorne v. 50 Madison Ave LLC

2021 NY Slip Op 05631
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 14, 2021
DocketIndex No. 602769/07 Appeal No. 14358 Case No. 2021-00157
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2021 NY Slip Op 05631 (Lorne v. 50 Madison Ave LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lorne v. 50 Madison Ave LLC, 2021 NY Slip Op 05631 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Lorne v 50 Madison Ave LLC (2021 NY Slip Op 05631)
Lorne v 50 Madison Ave LLC
2021 NY Slip Op 05631
Decided on October 14, 2021
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: October 14, 2021
Before: Gische, J.P., Moulton, González, Kennedy, Scarpulla, JJ.

Index No. 602769/07 Appeal No. 14358 Case No. 2021-00157

[*1]Simon Lorne et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents,

v

50 Madison Ave LLC et al., Defendants-Appellants, Goldstein Properties, LLC, et al., Defendants.


Clark Guldin, New York (Janesa Urbano of counsel), for appellants.

Schwartz Sladkus Reich Greenberg Atlas LLP, New York (Stephen H. Orel of counsel), for respondents.



Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Sherry Klein Heitler, J.), entered on or about November 18, 2020, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied defendants 50 Madison Ave LLC and Samson Management LLC's motion for partial summary judgment insofar as it sought dismissal of plaintiffs' second cause of action, for fraud, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court correctly denied defendants' motion for partial summary judgment regarding the fraud claim on the grounds that it had denied a prior summary judgment motion by defendants which made the same arguments. Defendants did not submit any new factual assertions or evidence that were unavailable to defendants before the prior motion, and they failed to show sufficient cause for making the second motion (see Jones v 636 Holding Corp., 73 AD3d 409, 409 [1st Dept 2010]; 11 Essex St. Corp. v Tower Ins. Co. of N.Y., 81 AD3d 516, 517 [1st Dept 2011]).

In light of the foregoing, we need not reach the remaining issues raised.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: October 14, 2021



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lorne v. 50 Madison Ave LLC
2021 NY Slip Op 05631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2021 NY Slip Op 05631, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lorne-v-50-madison-ave-llc-nyappdiv-2021.