Lori Ann Davidson v. Government Employees Insurance Co.
This text of 422 F. App'x 790 (Lori Ann Davidson v. Government Employees Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an action by Government Employees Insurance Company (“GEICO”) insureds, Lori Ann and Steve Davidson, in which the Davidsons allege that GEICO acted in bad faith in handling a personal injury claim against them and that such *791 bad faith action led to the entry of a judgment against them in excess of their insurance policy limits. The district court, in an order entered on October 26, 2010, granted GEICO summary judgment. The Davidsons appeal contending that material issues of fact exist which preclude summary judgment. We disagree. For the reasons the district court stated in its October 26 order, GEICO is not guilty of the bad faith the Davidsons allege.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
422 F. App'x 790, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lori-ann-davidson-v-government-employees-insurance-co-ca11-2011.