Lorene W. Byrd v. Fieldcrest Mills, Inc.

496 F.2d 1323, 1 BNA OSHC 1743
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 20, 1974
Docket74-1015
StatusPublished
Cited by31 cases

This text of 496 F.2d 1323 (Lorene W. Byrd v. Fieldcrest Mills, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lorene W. Byrd v. Fieldcrest Mills, Inc., 496 F.2d 1323, 1 BNA OSHC 1743 (4th Cir. 1974).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Alleging that the defendants’ negligent violation of the Occupational Safety and Health Act, 29 U.S.C. § 651 et seq., was the proximate cause of her intestate’s death, the plaintiff instituted this action for damages in the district court. Since, concededly, plaintiff’s intestate died as the result of injuries sustained in an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment with the defendant, Fieldcrest Mills, Inc., which was covered under the North Carolina Workmen’s Compensation Act, the district court concluded that 29 U.S.C. § 653(b)(4) 1 precluded a private remedy and dismissed the action under Rule 12(b)(6), Fed.R.Civ.P., for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.

Upon careful consideration of the record, briefs and oral arguments we agree with this conclusion of the district court and affirm the judgment of dismissal. 2

Affirmed.

1

. “Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to supersede or in any manner affect any workmen’s compensation law or to enlarge or diminish or affect in any other manner the common law or statutory rights, duties, or liabilities of employers and employees under any law with respect to injuries, diseases, or death of employees arising out of, or in the course of, employment.” 29 U.S.C. § 653 (b)(4).

2

. Cf. Skidmore v. Travelers Insurance Company, 356 F.Supp. 670 (E.D.La.1973), aff’d per curiam, 483 F.2d 67 (5 Cir. 1973).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stephens v. High Voltage Maintenance Co.
323 F. Supp. 2d 650 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2004)
Amer Fed Govt Empl v. Rumsfeld, Donald H.
321 F.3d 139 (D.C. Circuit, 2003)
Guzmán Cotto v. Estado Libre Asociado
156 P.R. Dec. 693 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 2002)
Blanca Iris Guzman Cotto Y Otros v. E.L.A. De P.R. Y Otros
2002 TSPR 59 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 2002)
Rosen v. Prince George's Bd. of Educ.
81 F.3d 151 (Fourth Circuit, 1996)
Rosen v. Prince George's Bd
Fourth Circuit, 1996
Marslender v. Virginia Elec. & Power Co.
37 Va. Cir. 199 (Norfolk County Circuit Court, 1995)
Adami v. GREEN GIANT DIV., a DIV. OF PILLSBURY CO.
849 F. Supp. 615 (N.D. Illinois, 1994)
Silkworth v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.
520 A.2d 1124 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1987)
Barrino v. Radiator Specialty Co.
340 S.E.2d 295 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1986)
Michael Pratico v. Portland Terminal Company
783 F.2d 255 (First Circuit, 1985)
Rankin v. City of Wichita Falls
762 F.2d 444 (Fifth Circuit, 1985)
Kelso Rankin v. City Of Wichita Falls
762 F.2d 444 (Fifth Circuit, 1985)
Greene v. Metals Selling Corp.
484 A.2d 478 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1984)
Trowell v. Brunswick Pulp and Paper Co.
522 F. Supp. 782 (D. South Carolina, 1981)
Goodman v. Kendall Gate-Investco., Inc.
395 So. 2d 240 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
496 F.2d 1323, 1 BNA OSHC 1743, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lorene-w-byrd-v-fieldcrest-mills-inc-ca4-1974.