Loren McFarlin and v. Federal Crop Insurance Corporation

438 F.2d 1237, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11238
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 22, 1971·No. 24615·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The summary judgment of the district court is affirmed on the authority of Federal Crop Insurance Corporation v. Merrill, 332 U.S. 380, 68 S.Ct. 1, 92 L.Ed. 10.

All of the elements for an estoppel between private persons are present. We have spent a lot of time trying to distinguish the Merrill case and have failed. We have to hold the literal terms of the contract apply.

The facts are most aggravating. Something is wrong when the citizen can recover for a dented fender caused by a postal employee at the wheel of a government truck and one cannot when he is booby-trapped by an employee of Federal Crop Insurance. Had McFarlin known he had no government insurance, he could have bought private insurance on his oranges. But righting such wrongs has not been assigned to us.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Loren McFarlin and v. Federal Crop Insurance Corporation, 438 F.2d 1237, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11238 (9th Cir. 1971).

438 F.2d 1237 (Loren McFarlin and v. Federal Crop Insurance Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McAndrew v. School Committee of Cambridge
480 N.E.2d 327 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1985)
Donovan v. I AND J, INC.
567 F. Supp. 93 (D. New Mexico, 1983)
Pitner v. Federal Crop Insurance Corporation
491 P.2d 1268 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1971)